scrypt-js

What is scrypt-js?

The scrypt-js npm package is a JavaScript implementation of the scrypt key derivation function. It is used primarily for securely hashing passwords and generating cryptographic keys.

What are scrypt-js's main functionalities?

Password Hashing

This feature allows you to hash a password using the scrypt key derivation function. The code sample demonstrates how to derive a key from a password and salt with specific parameters.

const scrypt = require('scrypt-js');
const password = Buffer.from('password');
const salt = Buffer.from('salt');
const N = 16384, r = 8, p = 1, dkLen = 32;
scrypt(password, salt, N, r, p, dkLen, (error, progress, key) => {
  if (error) {
    console.error(error);
  } else if (key) {
    console.log('Derived key:', key.toString('hex'));
  }
});

Key Derivation

This feature allows you to derive a cryptographic key from a secret and salt. The code sample shows how to generate a 64-byte key using the scrypt function.

const scrypt = require('scrypt-js');
const secret = Buffer.from('secret');
const salt = Buffer.from('salt');
const N = 16384, r = 8, p = 1, dkLen = 64;
scrypt(secret, salt, N, r, p, dkLen, (error, progress, key) => {
  if (error) {
    console.error(error);
  } else if (key) {
    console.log('Derived key:', key.toString('hex'));
  }
});

Other packages similar to scrypt-js

bcrypt

bcrypt is a popular library for hashing passwords. It is known for its simplicity and security. Unlike scrypt-js, bcrypt is specifically designed for password hashing and does not offer general key derivation functionality.

pbkdf2

pbkdf2 is another key derivation function available in the crypto module of Node.js. It is widely used for password hashing and key derivation. Compared to scrypt-js, pbkdf2 is generally faster but considered less secure against certain types of attacks.

argon2

argon2 is a modern key derivation function that won the Password Hashing Competition in 2015. It is designed to be highly secure and resistant to various types of attacks. Argon2 offers similar functionalities to scrypt-js but is considered more secure and efficient.

README

scrypt

The scrypt password-base key derivation function (pbkdf) is an algorithm designed to be brute-force resistant that converts human readable passwords into fixed length arrays of bytes, which can then be used as a key for symmetric block ciphers, private keys, et cetera.

Features:

• Non-blocking - Gives other events in the event loop opportunities to run (asynchronous)
• Cancellable - If the key is no longer required, the computation can be cancelled
• Progress Callback - Provides the current progress of key derivation as a percentage complete

Tuning

The scrypt algorithm is, by design, expensive to execute, which increases the amount of time an attacker requires in order to brute force guess a password, adjustable by several parameters which can be tuned:

• N - The CPU/memory cost; increasing this increases the overall difficulty
• r - The block size; increasing this increases the dependency on memory latency and bandwidth
• p - The parallelization cost; increasing this increases the dependency on multi-processing

Installing

node.js

If you do not require the progress callback or cancellable features, and your application is specific to node.js, you should likely use the built-in crypto package.

Otherwise, to install in node.js, use:

npm install scrypt-js

browser

<script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ricmoo/scrypt-js/master/scrypt.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

API

scrypt . scrypt ( password , salt , N , r , p , dkLen [ , progressCallback ] ) => Promise

Compute the scrypt PBKDF asynchronously using a Promise. If progressCallback is provided, it is periodically called with a single parameter, a number between 0 and 1 (inclusive) indicating the completion progress; it will always emit 0 at the beginning and 1 at the end, and numbers between may repeat.

scrypt . syncScrypt ( password , salt , N , r , p , dkLen ) => Uint8Array

Compute the scrypt PBKDF synchronously. Keep in mind this may stall UI and other tasks and the asynchronous version is highly preferred.

Example

<html>
  <body>
    <div><span id="progress"></span>% complete...</div>
    <!-- These two libraries are highly recommended for encoding password/salt -->
    <script src="libs/buffer.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

    <!-- This shim library greatly improves performance of the scrypt algorithm -->
    <script src="libs/setImmediate.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

    <script src="index.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript">

      // See the section below: "Encoding Notes"
      const password = new buffer.SlowBuffer("anyPassword".normalize('NFKC'));
      const salt = new buffer.SlowBuffer("someSalt".normalize('NFKC'));

      const N = 1024, r = 8, p = 1;
      const dkLen = 32;

      function updateInterface(progress) {
          document.getElementById("progress").textContent = Math.trunc(100 * progress);
      }

      // Async
      const keyPromise = scrypt.scrypt(password, salt, N, r, p, dkLen, updateInterface);

      keyPromise.then(function(key) {
          console.log("Derived Key (async): ", key);
      });

      // Sync
      const key = scrypt.syncScrypt(password, salt, N, r, p, dkLen);
      console.log("Derived Key (sync): ", key);
    </script>
  </body>
</html>

Encoding Notes

TL;DR - either only allow ASCII characters in passwords, or use
        String.prototype.normalize('NFKC') on any password

It is HIGHLY recommended that you do NOT pass strings into this (or any password-base key derivation function) library without careful consideration; you should convert your strings to a canonical format that you will use consistently across all platforms.

When encoding passwords with UTF-8, it is important to realize that there may be multiple UTF-8 representations of a given string. Since the key generated by a password-base key derivation function is dependent on the specific bytes, this matters a great deal.

Composed vs. Decomposed

Certain UTF-8 code points can be combined with other characters to create composed characters. For example, the letter a with the umlaut diacritic mark (two dots over it) can be expressed two ways; as its composed form, U+00FC; or its decomposed form, which is the letter "u" followed by U+0308 (which basically means modify the previous character by adding an umlaut to it).

// In the following two cases, a "u" with an umlaut would be seen
> '\u00fc'
> 'u\u0308'


// In its composed form, it is 2 bytes long
> new Buffer('u\u0308'.normalize('NFKC'))
<Buffer c3 bc>
> new Buffer('\u00fc')
<Buffer c3 bc>

// Whereas the decomposed form is 3 bytes, the letter u followed by U+0308
> new Buffer('\u00fc'.normalize('NFKD'))
<Buffer 75 cc 88>
> new Buffer('u\u0308')
<Buffer 75 cc 88>

Compatibility equivalence mode

Certain strings are often displayed the same, even though they may have different semantic means. For example, UTF-8 provides a code point for the roman number for one, which appears as the letter I, in most fonts identically. Compatibility equivalence will fold these two cases into simply the capital letter I.

> '\u2160'
'I'
> 'I'
'I'
> '\u2160' === 'I'
false
> '\u2160'.normalize('NFKC') === 'I'
true

Normalizing

The normalize() method of a string can be used to convert a string to a specific form. Without going into too much detail, I generally recommend NFKC, however if you wish to dive deeper into this, a nice short summary can be found in Pythons unicodedata module's documentation.

For browsers without normalize() support, the npm unorm module can be used to polyfill strings.

Another example of encoding woes

One quick story I will share is a project which used the SHA256(encodeURI(password)) as a key, which (ignoring rainbow table attacks) had an unfortunate consequence of old web browsers replacing spaces with + while on new web browsers, replacing it with a %20, causing issues for anyone who used spaces in their password.

Suggestions

• While it may be inconvenient to many international users, one option is to restrict passwords to a safe subset of ASCII, for example: /^[A-Za-z0-9!@#$%^&*()]+$/.
• My personal recommendation is to normalize to the NFKC form, however, one could imagine setting their password to a Chinese phrase on one computer, and then one day using a computer that does not have Chinese input capabilities and therefore be unable to log in.

See: Unicode Equivalence

Tests

The test cases from the scrypt whitepaper are included in test/test-vectors.json and can be run using:

npm test

Special Thanks

I would like to thank @dchest for his scrypt-async library and for his assistance providing feedback and optimization suggestions.

License

MIT license.

References

• scrypt white paper
• Wikipedia
• scrypt-async npm module
• scryptsy npm module
• Unicode Equivalence

Donations

Obviously, it's all licensed under the MIT license, so use it as you wish; but if you'd like to buy me a coffee, I won't complain. =)

• Ethereum - ricmoo.eth